Nazi Era History Recycled
Compilation and Commentary by Lucy Warner
December 14, 2016


AMG on TV - We Wuz Robbed
Alan Grayson

Dear Lucy,

Here is Part Two of Congressman Alan Grayson’s national TV interview this week, talking about what went wrong for the Democrats during last month’s election:

RT’s Lindsay France: Let’s talk about sticking to being able to lose gracefully. If they want to talk about recounts that’s one thing, but what the Democrats seem to be doing is not being able to accept it, that the white supremacists [alone] didn’t take this election away. The Democrats had a bad candidate, and the Republicans just had a nailed-on strategy. At the Harvard post-mortem, it’s a yearly thing, Kellyanne Conway and Jennifer Palmieri went at it. Palmieri accused the Trump [campaign] of promoting white supremacy. What do you think about this? Is it just feed into the narrative that DNC can’t lose [on the merits]?
GRAYSON: The narrative is very simple. We had two of the most unpopular candidates, possibly the two most unpopular candidates for President in history, run against each other. Trevor Noah pointed out two weeks before the election that they were so blessed to be running against each other, because they are running against the one candidate they might have some chance to beat. I did a poll three days before the election in which I pitted the candidates against other candidates for the presidential race. By the way, in case you’re wondering, Bernie Sanders would have won by 12 points against Donald Trump. I had trouble finding any candidate that would’ve done worse than the actual candidates that we had. I asked people “Would you rather have voted for none of the above?”, and 40 percent said yes, meaning that “none of the above” would have won in this election. So what we’re seeing [now] is sort of a carry-over, which is going to last for a long time, of people’s anxiety. People’s sense that this was a terrible experience, that choosing our national leader has become a terrible experience. Everybody feels like their dog just died.

LF: Most of us know what that’s like, and it’s absolutely terrible. Well, I think that as we progress through pushing officials to disclose this information, the Democrats may learn a hard lesson from Trump supporters, that their [most important] issues weren’t exactly what Democrats thought [they were]. Do you think that might be true? As information is disclosed, [are the Democrats] just missing the mark on what actually pushed Republicans to vote for Trump and even cross-over voters?
GRAYSON: Donald Trump started this, but both sides engaged in nothing but relentless negative politics during the campaign. That’s part of what led us to a sort of a photo finish, and in the end Clinton looks to have won the popular voter by 2.5 million votes. But what it did was it robbed the public of anything resembling a genuine debate about how to make the country a better place. Trump won because he at least took a stab at addressing that issue, by saying “Let’s Make America Great Again.” It’s just an empty slogan; he doesn’t know how to do that. But people appreciated the fact that he actually wanted to broach the subject of how to make America great, how to make American number one, and that turned out be the winning argument in the states where he needed to win, just barely. But it doesn’t change the fact that we saw ad hominem, relentless negative attacks from both sides, against both sides, all through the campaign, and in the Senate races and in the House races. Our political culture is sick.

GRAYSON: Thank you.

If you’d like to show your support for plainspoken common sense, then please click on that “Contribute” button below >>



Tell Director Clapper: Brief the Electors – Update on "Electoral College: Make Hillary Clinton President on December 19"
Shopping
Daniel Brezenoff Today at 3:11 PM
To
manessmorrison2@yahoo.com

Petition update

Daniel Brezenoff just posted an update on the petition you signed, Electoral College: Make Hillary Clinton President on December 19.

Tell Director Clapper: Brief the Electors

Dec 13, 2016 —

With just six days until the Electors choose our President, it's crucial that everyone who signed this petition takes action every day to STOP TRUMP.

Today, we're calling on Director of National Intelligence James Clapper to provide intelligence briefings to the Electors.

Call Director Clapper at (703) 733-8600. You may have to wait on hold for a minute.

Trump's ties to Russia and Russia's...



https://www.laprogressive.com/donald-like-adolph/?utm_source=LA+Progressive+Newsletter&utm_campaign=696295dc58-LAP+News+-+11+August+16+PC&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_9f184a8aad-696295dc58-286822829

Nazi Era Says to Be Wary

GO TO WEBSITE: Look closely at this photo – Trump is “returning” their “salute,” and not merely encouraging it.


In a previous essay I highlighted some of the similarities between Trump voters in the 2016 presidential election and German voters who made the Nazi Party the largest in the German Reichstag in 1932. But when Hitler became German chancellor in January 1933, he still had many constraints upon him. Nevertheless, he quickly freed himself from them, en route to becoming the dictator he was, one who led the Germans into a devastating war and perpetrated such horrors as the Holocaust.

As the inauguration of Donald Trump approaches, many who voted against him are asking themselves how to prevent him from leading the United States down paths that might also be harmful, how to prevent him from subverting the common good. Hitler’s dealings with others and his consolidation of power from 1933 forward can teach us much about the dangers awaiting us during a Trump presidency.

But before we examine these lessons, a word of caution: Trump is no Nazi or fascist (see here and here), and history never exactly repeats itself. Our president-elect has some resemblances to Hitler and Mussolini, and the conditions that elevated him to power have some parallels to theirs, but he is a unique phenomenon. (See here for comments on the usefulness and dangers of historical comparisons with the Trump phenomenon.) As the political philosopher Isaiah Berlin once wrote, “What matters is to understand a particular situation in its full uniqueness, the particular men and events and dangers, the particular hopes and fears which are actively at work in a particular place at a particular time.”

To take just one example of differences, in the 1920s and 1930s fear of communism helped the rise of both Mussolini and Hitler. Today, fears of illegal immigrants, terrorism, and globalization are more significant in aiding the appeal of Trumpism and similar movements in Europe.

Keeping these caveats in mind, let’s look at some of the lessons we can learn from the Hitler experience, including his consolidation of power.

Liberals and intellectuals who have underrated Trump’s political skills have often done so for the same reason Hitler was often dismissed by cultured people.

A central mistake made by many dealing with Hitler, both before and after he became chancellor, was to underestimate him. In 1930 a magazine editor described him as a “half-insane rascal,” a “pathetic dunderhead,” a “nowhere fool,” and a “big mouth.” Certainly, when Trump first announced he was running for the presidency, many thought he had no chance. All the way through the Republican primaries and then into his campaign against Hillary Clinton, he was underestimated. I, myself, wrote an article entitled “The Main Problem with Donald Trump: He’s a Fool.” (Calling him such, however, was not an underestimation of him or a denial of his “considerable talents . . . intelligence, or ‘street-smarts,’” but rather a comment on his lack of wisdom.)

Liberals and intellectuals who have underrated Trump’s political skills have often done so for the same reason Hitler was often dismissed by cultured people. As Lionel Trilling indicated in his Liberal Imagination (1950), liberalism “drifts toward a denial of the emotions and the imagination.” Martha Nussbaum’s Political Emotions: Why Love Matters for Justice, Jonathan Haidt’s The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion, and Rick Shenkman’s Political Animals: How Our Stone Age Brain Gets in the Way of Smart Politics are some recent books that have also indicated that voters often act more on emotions than on any rational considerations.

Shenkman’s earlier book, Just How Stupid Are We?: Facing the Truth About the American Voter, and the fact that Trump did much better among voters without a college degree, may tempt educated liberals to just blame Trump’s election on ignorance. But that would be a simplistic mistake, a failure to employ what Zachary Shore calls “strategic empathy,” which he describes as “the skill of stepping out of our own heads and into the minds of others. It is what allows us to pinpoint what truly drives and constrains the other side. Unlike stereotypes, which lump people into simplistic categories, strategic empathy distinguishes what is unique about individuals and their situation.” Such empathy does not imply agreement or that we should not eventually criticize positions we find faulty or abhorrent. But first we should try to understand them as fully as we can.

In underestimating Hitler, one common belief was that the responsibilities of leading a major nation like Germany would make him more sober and pragmatic, less the ideologue, than he was when in the 1920s he wrote the anti-Semitic, extremely nationalistic Mein Kampf. After meeting with President-elect Trump, President Obama stated “I don’t think he is ideological . . . . he is pragmatic.” Nevertheless, U. S. citizens would be foolish to ignore all the statements Trump made while campaigning. They reveal something important about him, and should not be dismissed or minimized as just meaningless campaign rhetoric. He may not be an ideologue, but more an opportunistic and erratic narcissist who can be just as dangerous.

An important lesson we can learn from Hitler’s consolation [sic] of power is that it is possible to dismantle constitutional protections from within a political system itself. After he had blamed a February 1933 fire that destroyed the Reichstag building on the German communists, he convinced President Hindenburg to sign an emergency decree that indefinitely suspended basic liberties and the due process of law. In March 1933 he convinced the Reichstag, where Nazis held 44 percent of the seats, to agree to the Enabling Act, which transferred legislative power to him and his cabinet and allowed him to suspend parts of the Weimar constitution. By the summer of 1933, all political parties except the Nazis were outlawed. After President von Hindenburg died in August 1934, Hitler merged the positions of president and chancellor and began referring to himself as Führer und Reichskanzler (Leader and Chancellor).

But, one may object, our political system is much stronger than the Weimer one and has been around for centuries. Certainly, that is true. But let’s not forget that the Republicans will control not only the Congress and most state governments, but also Supreme Court appointments. The Court will undoubtedly become more conservative, and it and our national amendment process enable us to interpret the Constitution in very different ways and to amend it. Remember, for example, that there was a time when women and most blacks could not vote and abortions were illegal. Also there was a time when Prohibition was the law of the land.

During his campaign Trump said of the children of families living illegally inside the USA, “They have to go,” adding “What they’re doing, they’re having a baby. And then all of a sudden, nobody knows . . . the baby’s here.” One source quoting these words stated that getting rid of these children would require repealing the 14th amendment’s citizenship clause and that would be unlikely since it would require “the votes of two-thirds of both houses of Congress and support from three-fourths of the nation’s state legislatures.”

But at least one important source of Trump support, Breitbart News, does not agree that such birthright citizenship is granted by the 14th amendment. An article on its website argues that “the Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment does not confer citizenship on the children of foreigners, whether legal or illegal.” (The former executive chairman of Breitbart News is Steve Bannon, former Trump campaign manager and now appointed as Trump’s chief White House strategist and senior counselor. Former Fox conservative commentator Glenn Beck and many others have linked him to white nationalism and hostility toward minorities, including Jews.)

Besides birthright citizenship for illegal immigrants, all sorts of other “rights,” including those connected with free speech (like flag burning), could be changed by new Supreme Court interpretations, new laws, or new amendments or changes to already existing ones.

One more important lesson to learn from Hitler’s Germany is to be wary of the power of nationalism and the likelihood it can lead to the tragedy of war. Hitler’s successes before WWII in making Germany “strong” again contributed greatly to his popularity. Among others, Hillary Clinton disputed Trump’s claim that he would make America great again. It was already great said she. But as Joyce Carol Oates and others have indicated the idea of “American exceptionalism” is a powerful force. The danger is serious that Trump may attempt to increase his powers by demonstrating and trying to embody such exceptionalism, and that many Americans may allow him to do so, achieving the psychological satisfaction of raising an index finger and chanting “we’re number one.”

In 1939, on the eve of Germany’s attack on Poland, many Germans, although certainly not Jews and other unfortunates, might have believed that Hitler’s actions since 1933 had furthered the German common good by making Germany great again. But by 1945, they saw more clearly what evil and suffering his policies had imposed, not just on foreign nations but on Germans themselves.

walter moss
Walter Moss

If Donald Trump attempts to trumpet American exceptionalism and pursues aggressive foreign policies, many U. S. citizens may for a while believe he has made our country “great again.” But pursuing such exceptionalism, whether in Germany in the 1930s or in the USA under a Trump presidency, is not the way to national greatness or heightening the common good.

Despite all the dangers that Trumpism presents, perhaps I overestimate them. I hope so. But wary we must be.

Walter Moss
History News Network

Print Friendly
POSTED ON DECEMBER 11, 2016


http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/intelligence-agencies-distressed-trump-s-rejection-findings-russia-n694686?cid=eml_nnn_20161212

Intelligence Agencies Distressed by Trump's Rejection of Findings on Russia
by ROBERT WINDREM and ALEX JOHNSON
NEWS DEC 12 2016, 7:42 AM ET

Play Video -- President-Elect Trump Rejects Analysis of Russia Behind Election Hacks 2:39
Play -- Donald Trump doubles down in rejecting CIA findings on Russia, election 3:16
Play -- 'There Needs to Be a Sense of Trust' Between Trump and Spy Agencies, Ex-FBI Official Says 6:45
Related: Russian Hacking: Republican, Democratic Senators Call for Joint Action
Play Video -- Donald Trump Dismisses Claims That Russia Interfered in 2016 Election 3:33
Play -- Kellyanne Conway on why Trump is interested in cabinet picks with ties to Russia 4:17
Related: Trump Once (Wrongly) Criticized Obama for Not Attending Intel Briefings


President-elect Donald Trump's dismissal of U.S. intelligence findings that Russia tried to sway the presidential election is a distressing slap in the face to the intelligence community, current and former U.S. intelligence officials said Sunday.

Trump on Sunday repeated his rejection of the intelligence community's conclusion that Russia actively worked to help him win the election, calling the idea "ridiculous" in an interview on "Fox News Sunday."

The comment, like others that Trump made during the campaign, "is contrary to all that is sacred to national security professionals who work day and night to protect this country," a U.S. intelligence official told NBC News.

The official called it "concerning" that the president-elect has chosen to "impugn the integrity of U.S. intelligence officials" by disputing professional intelligence judgments as false or politically partisan.

A congressional official with knowledge of the issue told NBC News on Saturday that the CIA has concluded that Russia mounted a covert intelligence operation to help Trump win the election.

Another source briefed on the intelligence told NBC News that the U.S. government has identified specific Russian actors it believes were involved in computer systems hacks — based on intercepted communications, human tips and computer forensics.

Trump dismissed such reports in a statement Friday that derided the CIA as "the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction."

A former senior intelligence official also noted Trump's assertion Sunday on Fox News that he doesn't always take the Presidential Daily Briefing — the top-secret briefing on national security developments — because "I'm, like, a smart person."


"It is curious that someone who refuses to take intelligence briefings has decided that he doesn't agree with the analysis contained in them," the former official said.

Rep. Adam Schiff of California, the top Democrat the House Intelligence Committee, also blasted Trump, saying the integrity of the electoral process is called into question "when President-elect Trump and his transition team minimize or dismiss the intelligence assessments themselves."

"Even more damaging are comments that impugn the tens of thousands of Americans who are at work every day of the year, many in great physical danger, to protect us and to provide our national leadership — regardless of political party — with the best information possible," Schiff said Saturday.

"Perhaps, once he has taken office, Mr. Trump will go to the CIA and look at the rows of memorial stars in the lobby — each representing a fallen officer — and reflect on his disparagement of the intelligence community's work," he said.



https://action.aclu.org/secure/volunteer-aclu-socal?utm_source=LA+Progressive+Newsletter&utm_campaign=71096f2bec-Good+Golly%2C+Those+Short+Shorts%21&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_9f184a8aad-71096f2bec-286822829

ACLU OF
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
VOLUNTEER WITH THE ACLU SOCAL

Since 1923, the ACLU of Southern California has worked to protect civil rights and civil liberties. Today, more than ever, we are ready to continue playing that important role.

We share the concern that the discriminatory rhetoric lobbed at communities of color, religious minorities, women, LGBTQ communities and immigrant families will become policy. We recognize that many members of these marginalized and vulnerable communities already fear for their safety. For many of you, these concerns have motivated you to get involved.

We need you. We need your financial support. We need your time and talents. Many have already reached out to express solidarity and to ask how they can help. This is your chance.

Join us. Attorneys, teachers, artists, parents, community members – all are welcome to contibute to the critical work ahead of us. Use the form below to sign up to volunteer with the ACLU SoCal.

Questions? Contact us at action@aclusocal.org.


NOTE, IN CASE YOU DO WANT TO VOLUNTEER TO HELP THE ACLU, THEY ASK FOR A DONATION OF AT LEAST $5.00. I GAVE THEM FIVE AND HAVE VOLUNTEERED TO RESEARCH FOR THEM BETWEEN 5 AND 10 HOURS A WEEK.